these tools are provided to provide ana analysis of the financial risk inherent in a company.
The Altman Z-score was formulated originally to be applied to public manufacturing companies as a scoring tool to identify corporations at risk of bankruptcy. The score is determined by a multivariate formula which has proven to be 80% to 90% reliable in predicting bankruptcy.
The original data sample consisted of 66 firms, half of which had filed for bankruptcy. A Multiple Discriminate Analysis was performed to identify which combination of ratios and factors best discriminated between firms that failed and firms that did not.
Edward Altman is the Max L. Heine Professor of Finance Emeritus at New York University, Stern School of Business and Director of the Credit and Fixed Income Research Program at the NYU Salomon Center.
The z-Score is is determined by applying a factor to five financial ratios as follows:
The weightings (or coefficients) in the Altman Z-Score formula were determined through a statistical method called Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA).
Interpretation of the Z-ScoreZ > 2.99: Safe zone (low bankruptcy risk).
1.81 < Z < 2.99: Grey zone (caution).
Z < 1.81: Distress zone (high bankruptcy risk).
Altman Z' Score (for Private Firms / Private Manufacturing Companies)
The original Z-score was formulated for public manufacturing companies. For private firms, the Altman Prime score was developed which essentially replaces the market value of equity with the book value of equity and revised co-efficients
The book value of equity is defined by Total Assets - Total Liabilities.
Z' > 2.99: Safe zone (low bankruptcy risk).
1.23 < Z' < 2.99: Grey zone (caution).
Z' < 1.23: Distress zone (high bankruptcy risk).
Altman Z'' Score (also written as Z''-Score) is a four-variable variant of the Altman Z-Score model.
Edward Altman developed it specifically for private or public non-manufacturing companies (e.g., service, retail, wholesale, or general firms where asset turnover can vary significantly by industry).
Why Z'' Exists
The original Z-Score and Z' (private manufacturing) include Sales / Total Assets (X5), which can be highly industry-sensitive.
Removing this variable makes the model more robust across different non-manufacturing sectors.
It uses Book Value of Equity (not market value), making it suitable for both private and public non-manufacturing firms.
Z'' > 2.6: Safe zone (low bankruptcy risk).
1.1 < Z'' < 2.6: Grey zone (caution).
Z'' < 1.1: Distress zone (high bankruptcy risk).
Ohlson O-Score (developed in 1980 by James Ohlson) is a logistic regression-based bankruptcy prediction model.
It serves as a strong alternative (and often more accurate) to the Altman Z-Score for forecasting the probability of corporate financial distress or bankruptcy within two years.
Key Advantages Over Altman Z-Score
Uses 9 variables (more comprehensive).
Based on a much larger sample (over 2,000 companies vs. Altman's ~66).
Employs logit (logistic regression) rather than multiple discriminant analysis.
Generally shows higher predictive accuracy for the 2-year horizon.
Outputs a score that can be converted into a probability.
Required Financial Information
You need data from the current year (t) and previous year (t-1) for some variables:
Total Assets (TA)
Total Liabilities (TL)
Current Assets (CA)
GCurrent Liabilities (CL)
Working Capital (WC) = Current Assets − Current Liabilities
Net Income (NI) for current and prior year
Funds from Operations (FFO) — typically Cash Flow from Operations
GNP Price Index (for size adjustment; base year 1968 = 100). For modern use, people often use CPI or GDP deflator as a proxy, or omit/adjust the size variable in updated implementations.
Dummy variables:OENEG (X): 1 if Total Liabilities > Total Assets (negative equity), else 0
Dummy variables:INTWO (Y): 1 if Net Income was negative for the last two years, else 0
Ohlson O-Score Formula
Where CHIN (change in net income) is:
Interpretation of the Ohlson ScoreO-Score > 0.5: High probability of bankruptcy within 2 years.
O-Score < 0.5 (especially negative values): Lower risk / financially healthier.
The raw O-score can be converted to a probability using the logistic function:
Beneish M-Score (developed by Professor Messod Beneish in 1999) is a statistical model designed to detect earnings manipulation (financial statement fraud) rather than outright bankruptcy risk.
It identifies companies that are likely 'cooking the books' by inflating revenues, deferring expenses, or manipulating accruals.
Uses 8 financial ratios (indices) derived from two consecutive years of financial statements.
Based on a probit model from a sample of companies that were known manipulators.
Outputs an M-Score that signals the probability of manipulation.
Probabilistic tool: A high score indicates patterns consistent with manipulation, but it is not definitive proof.
Deteriorating gross margins (incentive to manipulate)
The Beneish M-Score Formula (8 variable model)
The Beneish M-Score Formula applies factors to the indices calculated above to arrive at an M-Score
Interpretation of the M-ScoreThe interpretation thresholds of the M-Score are such that a score higher than -2.22 indicates a higher probability of earnings manipulation and an M-Score lower than -2.22 indicates manipulation of earnings is unlikely